Greener Electronics Guide di Greenpeace, la classifica delle aziende più “verdi”
Pubblicato il 28 Novembre 2007 da SergioEcco di seguito la classifica redatta da Greenpeace, relativa alle aziende più o meno attente alle tematiche ambientali.

E’ la Nintendo a portare la maglia nera, con un punteggio di 0/10 in quanto, secondo l’indagine condotta da Greenpeace, l’azienda non farebbe nulla per rendere i suoi prodotti eco compatibili.
In testa alla classifica troviamo Sony Ericsson e Samsung con un punteggio di 7.7, grazie alla loro particolare attenzione all’ambiente.
La classifica completa:
-7.7 Sony Ericsson - New leader due to improved takeback reporting, new models PVC free, but falls down on takeback practice.
-7.7 Samsung - Big improvements, with more products free of the worst toxic chemicals. Loses points for incomplete takeback practice.
-7.3 Sony - More products free of toxic PVC and improved reporting on recycling and takeback especially in the US.
-7.3Dell - Unchanged since the last version, still no products on the market without the worst chemicals.
-7.3 Lenovo - Unchanged since the last version, still no products on the market without the worst chemicals.
-7 Toshiba - Much improved on toxic chemicals but still lobbies in the US for regressive takeback policies.
-7 LGE - Unchanged since the last version, need better takeback for products other than phones.
-7 Fujitsu-Siemens - Unchanged since the last version, needs toxic elimination timelines, better takeback coverage and reporting of amounts recycled.
More
- 6.7 Nokia- A steep fall! Strong on toxic chemicals but penalty point deducted for deficiencies in takeback practice in Thailand, Russia and Argentina during our testsing.
-6.7 HP - Finally provided timelines for eliminating worst toxic chemicals, though not for all products; needs to improve takeback coverage.
-6 Apple - Slightly improved with new iMacs and some iPods reducing the use of toxic chemicals, takeback programme still needs more work. More
-5.7 Acer - Unchanged since the last version, needs better takeback coverage and reporting of amounts recycled.
-5 Panasonic - Unchanged since the last version, need better takeback coverage and reporting of amounts recycled.
-5 Motorola - Big faller due to penalty point for poor takeback practice in Philippines, Thailand and India revealed by our testing. Still no timelines for eliminating the most harmful chemicals.
-4.7 Sharp - New to the guide - some plus points on toxic chemicals elimination but poor takeback policy and practice.
-2.7 Microsoft - New to the guide - long timeline for toxic chemicals elimination (2011) and poor takeback policy and practice.
-2 Philips - New to the guide - no timeline for toxic chemicals elimination and zero points on e-waste policy and practice.
-0 Nintendo - New to the guide - first global brand to score zero across all criteria!
Per ulteriori informazioni: www.greenpeace.org
Tag: Electronics, Greener, Greenpeace, Guide
Articoli Correlati
- Greenpeace: “Alla ricerca del prodotto elettronico più verde”
- Greenpeace pubblica la VII edizione della Eco Guida
- Ecoguida di Greenpeace: voti bassi per tutti ad eccezione di Sony Ericsson e Sony
- Greenpeace denuncia l’inadeguatezza del governo Lula per fermare la deforestazione in Amazzonia
- La nave di Greenpeace “Esperanza” intercetta le baleniere
Articoli Recenti
- Infezione renale in nove bambini causata dal latte ” alla spina”
- Il cattivo tempo impedisce allo shuttle Endeavour l’atterraggio in Florida
- La depressione negli anziani può scatenare l’ictus
- Gli italiani non temono l’ Aids
- Scoperta una nuova molecola per curare la Tbc
- Proteine chiave per combattere la sindrome di Down già in utero











