Greener Electronics Guide di Greenpeace, la classifica delle aziende più “verdi”
Pubblicato il 28 novembre 2007 da SergioEcco di seguito la classifica redatta da Greenpeace, relativa alle aziende più o meno attente alle tematiche ambientali.
E’ la Nintendo a portare la maglia nera, con un punteggio di 0/10 in quanto, secondo l’indagine condotta da Greenpeace, l’azienda non farebbe nulla per rendere i suoi prodotti eco compatibili.
In testa alla classifica troviamo Sony Ericsson e Samsung con un punteggio di 7.7, grazie alla loro particolare attenzione all’ambiente.
La classifica completa:
-7.7 Sony Ericsson – New leader due to improved takeback reporting, new models PVC free, but falls down on takeback practice.
-7.7 Samsung – Big improvements, with more products free of the worst toxic chemicals. Loses points for incomplete takeback practice.
-7.3 Sony – More products free of toxic PVC and improved reporting on recycling and takeback especially in the US.
-7.3Dell – Unchanged since the last version, still no products on the market without the worst chemicals.
-7.3 Lenovo – Unchanged since the last version, still no products on the market without the worst chemicals.
-7 Toshiba – Much improved on toxic chemicals but still lobbies in the US for regressive takeback policies.
-7 LGE – Unchanged since the last version, need better takeback for products other than phones.
-7 Fujitsu-Siemens – Unchanged since the last version, needs toxic elimination timelines, better takeback coverage and reporting of amounts recycled.
More
- 6.7 Nokia- A steep fall! Strong on toxic chemicals but penalty point deducted for deficiencies in takeback practice in Thailand, Russia and Argentina during our testsing.
-6.7 HP – Finally provided timelines for eliminating worst toxic chemicals, though not for all products; needs to improve takeback coverage.
-6 Apple – Slightly improved with new iMacs and some iPods reducing the use of toxic chemicals, takeback programme still needs more work. More
-5.7 Acer – Unchanged since the last version, needs better takeback coverage and reporting of amounts recycled.
-5 Panasonic – Unchanged since the last version, need better takeback coverage and reporting of amounts recycled.
-5 Motorola – Big faller due to penalty point for poor takeback practice in Philippines, Thailand and India revealed by our testing. Still no timelines for eliminating the most harmful chemicals.
-4.7 Sharp – New to the guide – some plus points on toxic chemicals elimination but poor takeback policy and practice.
-2.7 Microsoft – New to the guide – long timeline for toxic chemicals elimination (2011) and poor takeback policy and practice.
-2 Philips – New to the guide – no timeline for toxic chemicals elimination and zero points on e-waste policy and practice.
-0 Nintendo – New to the guide – first global brand to score zero across all criteria!
Per ulteriori informazioni: www.greenpeace.org
Tag: Electronics, Greener, Greenpeace, Guide
Articoli Correlati
- Greenpeace: “Alla ricerca del prodotto elettronico più verde”
- Greenpeace pubblica la VII edizione della Eco Guida
- Ecoguida di Greenpeace: voti bassi per tutti ad eccezione di Sony Ericsson e Sony
- Greenpeace denuncia l’inadeguatezza del governo Lula per fermare la deforestazione in Amazzonia
- La nave di Greenpeace “Esperanza” intercetta le baleniere
Articoli Recenti
- Google celebra il 25esimo anniversario della scoperta del Fullerene
- Alla ricerca di un semaforo intelligente per la E3 proteina che consente lo sviluppo di metastasi
- ICSS 2010: II Conferenza Internazionale sulla Scienza della Sostenibilità
- Mars 500: al via la simulazione di una missione completa su Marte
- Il Parlamento approva il regolamento UE per facilitare la donazione e il trapianto di organi
- Giove non è più lo stesso?